<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: January 18:  Gosh Dim It All!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://365daysofastronomy.org/2009/01/18/january-18-gosh-dim-it-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://365daysofastronomy.org/2009/01/18/january-18-gosh-dim-it-all/</link>
	<description>An astronomy podcast every day, all year</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:34:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ZorkFox</title>
		<link>http://365daysofastronomy.org/2009/01/18/january-18-gosh-dim-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>ZorkFox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://365daysofastronomy.org/?p=340#comment-310</guid>
		<description>My &quot;correction&quot; is not as impressive as Joe&#039;s, and contains no Greek letters, but I noticed the podcast description in iTunes credits the Let There Be LIGHT Team, rather than Night.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My "correction" is not as impressive as Joe's, and contains no Greek letters, but I noticed the podcast description in iTunes credits the Let There Be LIGHT Team, rather than Night.  <img src='http://365daysofastronomy.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://365daysofastronomy.org/2009/01/18/january-18-gosh-dim-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://365daysofastronomy.org/?p=340#comment-300</guid>
		<description>joe nahhas, why don&#039;t you publish? If you are right, every peer-reviewed astronomical journal would rush to publish your paper. The comments of an astronomy podcast are a very weird place to make your case!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joe nahhas, why don't you publish? If you are right, every peer-reviewed astronomical journal would rush to publish your paper. The comments of an astronomy podcast are a very weird place to make your&nbsp;case!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe nahhas</title>
		<link>http://365daysofastronomy.org/2009/01/18/january-18-gosh-dim-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>joe nahhas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://365daysofastronomy.org/?p=340#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Kepler (demolish) Vs Einstein&#039;s 

Areal velocity is constant: r² θ&#039; =h         Kepler&#039;s Law
 h = 2π a b/T; b=a√ (1-ε²); a = mean distance value; ε = eccentricity
r² θ&#039;= h = S² w&#039;
Replace r with S = r exp (ỉ wt); h = [r² Exp (2iwt)] w&#039;
w&#039; = (h/r²) exp [-2(i wt)] 
w&#039;= (h/r²) [cosine 2(wt) - ỉ sine 2(wt)] = (h/r²) [1- 2sine² (wt) - ỉ sin 2(wt)] 
w&#039; =  w&#039;(x) + ỉ w&#039;(y) ;  w&#039;(x) = (h/r²) [ 1- 2sine² (wt)]  
 w&#039;(x) – (h/r²) = - 2(h/r²)sine²(wt) = - 2(h/r²)(v/c)²  v/c=sine wt
(h/ r²)(Perihelion/Periastron)= [2πa.a√ (1-ε²)]/Ta² (1-ε) ²= [2π√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²

 Δ w&#039; = (d w/d t – h/r²] = -4π {[√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² radian per second
Δ w&#039; = (- 4π /T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² radians 
Δ w&#039; = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² degrees; Multiplication by 180/π 
Δ w&#039; = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/(1-ε)²} (v/c)² degrees/100 years  
Δ w” = (-720x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² seconds of arc by 3600

Δ w&quot; = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²]/(1-ε)²} (v/c)² seconds of arc per century
This Kepler&#039;s Equation solves all the problems Einstein and all physicists could not solve

The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- --.) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4) v=√ [G m M / (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m&lt;&lt;M; Solar system    
 Advance of Perihelion of mercury.

G=6.673x10^-11; M=2x10^30kg; m=.32x10^24kg
 ε = 0.206; T=88days; c = 299792.458 km/sec; a = 58.2km/sec
Calculations yields:
 v =48.14km/sec; [√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 1.552 
Δ w”= (-720x36526x3600/88) x (1.552) (48.14/299792)²=43.0”/century

Conclusions: The 43&quot; seconds of arc of advance of perihelion of Planet Mercury (General relativity) is given by Kepler&#039;s equation better than all of Published papers of Einstein. Kepler&#039;s Equation can solve Einstein&#039;s nemesis DI Her Binary stars motion and all the other dozens of stars motions posted for past 40 years on NASA website SAO/NASA as unsolved by any physics 

Anyone dare to prove me wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kepler (demolish) Vs&nbsp;Einstein's </p>
<p>Areal velocity is constant: r² θ' =h         Kepler's Law<br />
 h = 2π a b/T; b=a√ (1-ε²); a = mean distance value; ε = eccentricity<br />
r² θ'= h = S² w'<br />
Replace r with S = r exp (ỉ wt); h = [r² Exp (2iwt)] w'<br />
w' = (h/r²) exp [-2(i wt)]<br />
w'= (h/r²) [cosine 2(wt) - ỉ sine 2(wt)] = (h/r²) [1- 2sine² (wt) - ỉ sin 2(wt)]<br />
w' =  w'(x) + ỉ w'(y) ;  w'(x) = (h/r²) [ 1- 2sine² (wt)]<br />
 w'(x) – (h/r²) = - 2(h/r²)sine²(wt) = - 2(h/r²)(v/c)²  v/c=sine wt<br />
(h/ r²)(Perihelion/Periastron)= [2πa.a√ (1-ε²)]/Ta² (1-ε) ²= [2π√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε)&nbsp;²</p>
<p> Δ w' = (d w/d t – h/r²] = -4π {[√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² radian per second<br />
Δ w' = (- 4π /T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² radians<br />
Δ w' = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² degrees; Multiplication by 180/π<br />
Δ w' = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/(1-ε)²} (v/c)² degrees/100 years<br />
Δ w” = (-720x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} (v/c) ² seconds of arc by&nbsp;3600</p>
<p>Δ w" = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²]/(1-ε)²} (v/c)² seconds of arc per century<br />
This Kepler's Equation solves all the problems Einstein and all physicists could not&nbsp;solve</p>
<p>The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- --.) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4) v=√ [G m M / (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m&lt;&lt;M; Solar system<br />
 Advance of Perihelion of&nbsp;mercury.</p>
<p>G=6.673x10^-11; M=2x10^30kg; m=.32x10^24kg<br />
 ε = 0.206; T=88days; c = 299792.458 km/sec; a = 58.2km/sec<br />
Calculations yields:<br />
 v =48.14km/sec; [√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 1.552<br />
Δ w”= (-720x36526x3600/88) x (1.552)&nbsp;(48.14/299792)²=43.0”/century</p>
<p>Conclusions: The 43" seconds of arc of advance of perihelion of Planet Mercury (General relativity) is given by Kepler's equation better than all of Published papers of Einstein. Kepler's Equation can solve Einstein's nemesis DI Her Binary stars motion and all the other dozens of stars motions posted for past 40 years on NASA website SAO/NASA as unsolved by any&nbsp;physics </p>
<p>Anyone dare to prove me&nbsp;wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike T.</title>
		<link>http://365daysofastronomy.org/2009/01/18/january-18-gosh-dim-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://365daysofastronomy.org/?p=340#comment-204</guid>
		<description>I would like to hear more about the Scientific experiment, and the results that the kids come up with in your next podcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to hear more about the Scientific experiment, and the results that the kids come up with in your next&nbsp;podcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let There Be Night! &#171; Bellaire Astronomy Blog</title>
		<link>http://365daysofastronomy.org/2009/01/18/january-18-gosh-dim-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Let There Be Night! &#171; Bellaire Astronomy Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://365daysofastronomy.org/?p=340#comment-171</guid>
		<description>[...] podcast for today over at 365 Days of Astronomy is all about how one group of students plan to measure the degree of light pollution in their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] podcast for today over at 365 Days of Astronomy is all about how one group of students plan to measure the degree of light pollution in their&nbsp;[...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
